Log in to Mathigon

Create New Account

Reset Password     


Send us Feedback

Please let us know if you have any feedback and suggestions, or if you find any errors and bugs in our content.

Sorry, your message couldn’t be submitted. Please try again!

Thanks for your feedback!

Reset Progress

Are you sure that you want to reset your progress, response and chat data for all sections in this course? This action cannot be undone.


Select one of the keywords on the left…

Polygons and PolyhedraPlatonic Solids

Reveal All Steps

At the beginning of this course we defined regular polygons as particularly “symmetric” polygons, where all sides and angles are the same. We can do something similar for polyhedra.

In a regular polyhedron all faces are all the same kind of regular polygon, and the same number of faces meet at every vertex. Polyhedra with these two properties are called Platonic solids, named after the Greek philosopher Plato.

So what do the Platonic solids look like – and how many of them are there? To make a 3-dimensional shape, we need at least faces to meet at every vertex. Let’s start systematically with the smallest regular polygon: equilateral triangles:

If we create a polyhedron where three equilateral triangles meet at every vertex, we get the shape on the left. It is called a Tetrahedron and has faces. (“Tetra” means “four” in Greek).

If four equilateral triangles meet at every vertex, we get a different Platonic solid. It is called the Octahedron and has faces. (“Octa” means “eight” in Greek. Just like “Octagon” means 8-sided shape, “Octahedron” means 8-faced solid.)

If triangles meet at every vertex, we get the Icosahedron. It has faces. (“Icosa” means “twenty” in Greek.)

If triangles meet at every vertex, something different happens: we simply get a tessellationa quadrilateralanother Icosahedron, instead of a 3-dimensional polyhedron.

And seven or more triangles at every vertex also don’t produce new polyhedra: there is not enough space around a vertex, to fit that many triangles.

This means we’ve found Platonic solids consisting of triangles. Let’s move on to the next regular polygon: squares.

If squares meet at every vertex, we get the cube. Just like dice, it has faces. The cube is sometimes also called Hexahedron, after the Greek word “hexa" for “six”.

If squares meet at every vertex, we get another tessellationa tetrahedronanother cube. And like before, five or more squares also won’t work.

Next, let’s try regular pentagons:

If pentagons meet at every vertex, we get the Dodecahedron. It has faces. (“Dodeca” means “twelve” in Greek.)

Like before, four or more pentagons don’t workare possible because there is not enough space.

The next regular polygon to try are hexagons:

If three hexagons meet at every vertex, we immediately get a tessellationpolyhedronhexahedron. Since there is no space for more than three, it seems like there are no Platonic solids consisting of hexagons.

The same also happens for all regular polygons with more than six sides. They don’t tessellate, and we certainly don’t get any 3-dimensional polygons.

This means that there are just Platonic solids! Let’s have a look at all of them together:








20 Vertices
30 Edges


12 Vertices
30 Edges

Notice how the number of faces and vertices are swapped aroundthe same for cube and octahedron, as well as dodecahedron and icosahedron, while the number of edges stays the sameare different. These pairs of Platonic solids are called dual solids.

We can turn a polyhedron into its dual, by “replacing” every face with a vertex, and every vertex with a face. These animations show how:

The tetrahedron is dual with itself. Since it has the same number of faces and vertices, swapping them wouldn’t change anything.

Plato believed that all matter in the Universe consists of four elements: Air, Earth, Water and Fire. He thought that every element correspond to one of the Platonic solids, while the fifth one would represent the universe as a whole. Today we know that there are more than 100 different elements which consist of spherical atoms, not polyhedra.

Images from Johannes Kepler’s book “Harmonices Mundi” (1619)